Are Celebrities Ruining Our Social Networking Experience?

by The Cubicle Chick on July 30, 2010

in Sports & Entertainment

Yesterday morning when I checked my email, I was inundated with news about rapper/producer Kanye West joining Twitter and performing an impromptu “concert” for Facebook staffers. I really didn’t think this was news per-se; celebrities have been on Twitter since its beginning and Facebook has seen it’s share of stars come through their doors (such as Ashton Kutcher, etc.). Why was this news? Then people began to tweet and discuss Kanye’s Twitter follower numbers at length (which were at 50,000 in just three hours after he had joined—he’s now at over 200,000— and he follows no one womp womp) and a recording of his freestyle appearance at Facebook surfaced on YouTube. It got me to thinking: are celebrities taking over social networks? And secondly, are they ruining our social networking experience?

I really began to question this a few weeks ago when LeBron James joined Twitter, and held everyone captive for three days while he made his big announcement about leaving the Cavaliers to go play with the Miami Heat. People thought that LeBron was going to make his announcement on his Twitter page, so there was a rush of people following him so they could be the “first” to learn about where he was going to go team-wise. My Twitter and Facebook stream seemed to all be discussing LeBron and the “decision” at length, so much so that I didn’t even want to log on. Is this LeBron’s fault?—of course not. But doesn’t the experience of getting to know people through social networking get singed when the discussion begins to turn to celebs and celebs only?

All of this is just food for thought, mind you, but I could care less what LeBron or Kanye tweets about. I love what they do on the court and in the recording studio, but they don’t give a damn about me or my tweets (because they do not tweet or follow us “regular” folk), so why should I bother? I don’t follow many celebs, and the ones I do (i.e. Holly Robinson Peete, Tionna Smalls, Reagan Gomez-Preston, Wil Wheaton, etc.) tweet back and regularly engage with their followers.

LeBron and Kanye aren’t on Twitter to engage. They are on there to shamelessly plug and create publicity for their brands. New album coming out? Get on Twitter. Need to create a stir about your next move? Use social media of course and let it work it’s magic!

And let’s not talk about the psuedo celebrities (Kat Stacks, Natalie Nunn, et al) who are so desperate to be somebody, that tweeting gives them celebrity status even though they ain’t famous in the real world. And what about the stars who tweet some random stuff that can be considered offensive (see Chris Brown or Asher Roth) just to delete it like it didn’t exist? Of course there are screen caps of the tweet, so the covering up of some things are non-existent.

I enjoy Twitter because of the engaging conversations I have with folk. I do not want to send a tweet to a celebrity unless I know they are known to engage back and reciprocate. If I want to read about their lives, I will go to the gossip blogs. And I find that most celebs are boring Tweeters.

Maybe that is why Kanye is already at the number of followers he has—because we are all waiting for him to have another MTV Awards moment. Maybe he should tweet while drinking some Hennessy.

What do you think of celebrities and their usage of social networks? Is it overkill? Or do you feel like they enhance your social networking experience? Feedback please.

Photo and video from Sandra Rose Blog

[ORIGINALLY POSTED HERE]

Post Summary

Doesn’t the experience of getting to know people through social networking get singed when the discussion begins to turn to celebs and celebs only?

Stay in the Loop!

Dig this post? There's plenty more where that came from. Here are some other ways to get your FXP fix:

{ 2 trackbacks }

Tweets that mention Are Celebrities Ruining Our Social Networking Experience? -- Topsy.com
July 30, 2010 at 11:08 am
Advantages and Limitations of Social Networks | Hot Article Directory
July 30, 2010 at 4:08 pm

{ 21 comments… read them below or add one }

2 KaNisa July 30, 2010 at 9:26 am

Social networks are a business now. It’s another form of strategic communications.

It’s amazing really, I had a meeting with a client on social networking this week.They have a 50 page manual on how to use Facebook.

Twitter’s manual has 30 pages.

Most of the time, celebs and companies just use it as another form of publicity. What better way than to make your product more accessible than to have them communicate using the joe schmoe methods?

Reply

4 Garfield July 30, 2010 at 9:57 am

I don’t see how they ruin Twitter. Or Facebook. Perhaps the people you follow are the ones ruining your experience since…they’re the ones tweeting about it. *Shrugs*

Reply

6 Mr. Riley July 30, 2010 at 10:25 am

Honestly, who cares if a celebrity tweets back because nine times out of ten they wouldn’t speak to half the average joe’s they tweet to, and really there life is just that boring anyway…they use stuff like twitter to keep loyality (from fans) going in there favor when it comes to making money and that’s it..

Reply

7 bitter black dude July 30, 2010 at 10:35 am

i tried twitter and couldnt stand it. too much random bullshit i dont give a damn about. anyway, i really like e badu and tried to follow her. it was around that window seat video. she was so negative, paranoid, and defensive i am no longer a fan. go figure.

Reply

8 Mr. Riley July 30, 2010 at 3:41 pm

“she was so negative, paranoid, and defensive i am no longer a fan. go figure.”

LOL…..and they wonder why they get negative labels…

Reply

9 bitter black dude July 30, 2010 at 3:49 pm

seriously. I had a man crush on badu for the longest. her music has inspired me at different points in my life. “Times a Wastin” on the mommas gun joint was in constant rotation.

so maybe i had this unfair image of how she would be. when i started reading her feeds i was so turned off, i cant even take her music seriously anymore. it was really dissapointing. dont think ive gotten over it.

Reply

10 Greg Dragon July 30, 2010 at 7:01 pm

Ya Erika’s a bird, I peeped that a really long time ago. Lots of artists are, that’s why its better to not get so close to these people’s personal lives. Art is art, if you love the illusion her sound brings then you should still listen to her music. Amy Winehouse is a hot mess and a permanent case of erectile dysfunction to look at, but damn it if I don’t love her 2 albums. Love the music not the bird singing it.

Reply

11 Mr. Riley July 30, 2010 at 9:20 pm

Amy Winehouse is a hot mess and a permanent case of erectile dysfunction to look at…

*Ditto on that statement*…LOL..

Reply

20 A. Wills July 30, 2010 at 6:43 pm

I don’t think it’s celebs who ruin twitter, it’s the groupy-types who worship them. I’ve only been on twitter for a few weeks and don’t log on very often, because I see the same stuff. I understand why the RT option is there, but it’s like certain celebs will say 1 thing and thousands of people will RT as if what was said is the gospel truth or something mind-blowing. For example, Kanye West tweeted “life is awesome” and it was on my page 13 times when I logged on. I mean, really? People RT Rev Run all day and the dude has yet to say something I haven’t heard before smh

So for me, I think Twitter is all in who you follow and you tweet to. If you don’t speak or if they don’t respond, why follow? And for celebrities, I think it just cuts down the cost of having a publicist. That’s a few grand that they can now spend on bottles or Gucci sunglasses or whatever

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: